Home About Us Contact Us

Official Journals By StatPerson Publication

Table of Content Volume 11 Issue 2 - August 2019


 

Magnetic resonance imaging in extracranial head and neck lesions

 

Sudhir Navale1, Amol Bandgar2*, Prathamesh Bongale3, Sahil Kulkarni4

 

1,2Associate Professor, 3,4Resident, Department of Radiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Medical College Pune, Maharashtra, INDIA.

Email: drmangalmahajan@gmail.com

 

Abstract               Objective: The objective of our study was to evaluate the role of MRI imaging of extracranial head and neck lesion and to detect and characterize the lesions of different etiologies.Materials And Methods: In the present study 50 patients of all age group and sex with suspected extracranial head and neck lesions (detected by clinical history, USG or CT scan) presenting to the Department of Radio diagnosis and Imaging, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune were imaged using Philips MRI System – “Philips Achieva”, 1.5 tesla super conducting system. A detailed history was taken before conducting a MRI scan for the patient. Results: Head and neck pathologies were seen predominantly in 4th to 6th decade of life. Male preponderance was seen. Out of 50 patients 37 patients had a neoplastic etiology while 13 had a benign disease. Oral cavity was the commonest locations for head neck neoplastic etiologies. Conclusion: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive imaging modality in the evaluation of extracranial head and neck lesions, because of its excellent soft tissue contrast resolution and lack of ionizing radiation. It helps in determining the site of origin of the lesion and its characterization and extension / spread into the adjacent structures. It can also detect early bone involvement. MR imaging can be safely done in pregnant women and patients with deranged renal function tests. However, time of examination, patient co-operation and cost are limitations of MR imaging. Furthermore MR imaging cannot be performed in patients with dental implants and surgical clips.

Key Word: extracranial head, neck lesions.

 

 

INTRODUCTION

The expanding interest in the neck is majorly due to technical development and availability of cross-sectional imaging. imaging has become an indispensable tool in the characterization and staging head and neck pathologies. MR scans gives excellent tissue characterization over CT and hence helps in the exact delineation of tumor margins in the nasopharynx, oropharynx, and skull base regions5. MRI also depicts cross-sectional anatomy and pathology in three planes without intravenous contrast administration, patient manipulation, or ionizing irradiation. However, High quality MRI examinations of the head and neck consume more time than CT imaging and necessitates patient cooperation for a longer period of time.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a Prospective, observational study. A total of 50 patients of all age group and sex with suspected extracranial head and neck lesions (detected by clinical history, USG or CT scan) presenting to the Department of Radio diagnosis and Imaging, Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University Medical College, Pune were included in the study. These patients underwent MR imaging of the extracranial All intracranial skull base and cervical spine lesions on a Philips MRI System – “Philips Achieva”, 1.5 tesla super conducting system.


 

 

RESULTS

50 patients with suspected extracranial head and neck lesions were evaluated in this study.

Age distribution:

In our study maximum number of patients were in the age group of 41-60 years, followed by age group of 21-40 years and 61-80 years. According to the study done by Bhurgari Y et al61, mean age of the patients was 53.0 years and peak incidence was at 64-69 years. Our results are consistent with the literature.

Table 1: AGE WISE DISTRIBUTION (IN YEARS).

Age

(years)

No. of patients

Total

(Percentage)

0-20

5

10 %

21-40

15

30 %

41-60

19

38 %

61-80

9

18 %

81-100

2

4 %

Total

50

100 %


In the present study 30 out of the 50 patients were males. Hence, a male preponderance was seen. Adeyami BF et al1 reported male predominance in head and neck cancers with ratio being 1.8:1. Mahrotra R et al2 reported 144 malignant lesions with 114 in males and 30 in females. According to Siddiqui MS et al3, malignant cases more commoner in males than in females with Male:Female ration being 3.1:1. The male predominance correlates well with our study.

Table 2: GENDER WISE DISTRIBUTION.

Gender

Number of patients

Percentage (%)

Male

30

60 %

Female

20

40 %

Total

50

100 %

In our study there was male predominance (60 %) when compared to females (40 %).Female: Male ratio is - 3:2

 

Characterization of pathologies into benign and malignant:

Neoplastic lesions preponderance was seen in our study. Out of the 50 cases studied 37 patients had a malignant/neoplastic pathology while the rest 13 had a benign disease. Both the benign and neoplastic lesions were commoner in the age group of 41-60 years. Otto RA et al4 reported that neck lesions in children are most likely to be inflammatory or congenital. In older patients (>40 years) neoplastic lesions are more likely. Siddiqui MS et al3 studied 455 head and neck neoplasms with 241 being benign and 214 being malignant. This does not correlate with our study and this variation may be due to a larger older age patient sample size.

 

Distribution of neoplastic lesions

The table below shows the spectrum of neoplastic findings seen in our study. The most common of all these was tongue carcinoma (27.02 %) ( 10 cases) followed by buccal mucosal carcinoma (13.51 %) (5 cases),mandibular alveolar carcinoma (8.10 %) (3 cases ) and malignant lymphadenopathy (8.10%) (3 cases). The Commonest site for neoplastic lesions was oral cavity with 23 (46%) lesions. Andisheh Tadbir A et al7, found that the tongue was the most commonly affected site (53%) which correlates with our study.

 

Table 3: DISTRIBUTION OF NEOPLASTIC LESIONS

Neoplastic lesion

No. of lesion

Percentage (%)

Laryngeal carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Buccal mucosal carcinoma

5

13.51 %

Gingivo-buccal mucosal carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Mandibular alveolar carcinoma

3

8.10 %

Retromolar trigone carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Tongue carcinoma

10

27.02 %

Lip carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Mandibular carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Palatal carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Dentigerous cyst

1

2.70 %

Maxillary alveolar carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Sinonasal carcinoma

2

5.40 %

Thyroid carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Parotid carcinoma

1

2.70 %

Orbital dermoid

1

2.70 %

Orbital hemangioma

1

2.70 %

Cystic Hygroma

1

2.70 %

Malignant Lymphadenopathy

3

8.10 %

Etxracranial dermoid

1

2.70 %

Total

37

100 %


Table 8: DISTRIBUTION OF POST CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT PATTERN OF NEOPLASTIC and INFECTIVE/ INFLAMMATORY LESIONS

Post contrast enhancement pattern

NEOPLASTIC

INFECTIVE/ INFLAMMATORY LESIONS

Benign lesions

Malignant lesions

Homogenous

1

4

2

Heterogeneous

2

26

4

Rim

2

-

1

No enhancement

1

-

1

Contrast not given

1

-

5

Total

7

30

13

 

Association of lymphadenopathy in neoplastic and infective/ inflammatory lesions:

In our study lymphadenopathy was the commonest associated pathology, which was seen in 33 (66%) cases out of 50. The majority of benign lesions as well as the infective/ inflammatory lesions did not show associated lymphadenopathy while the majority of malignant lesions had lymphadenopathy associated with them.Lymphadenopathy was seen in malignant lesions accounting for 26 (87%) cases followed by 6 (46%) cases of infective / inflammatory etiology. Lymphadenopathy was seen in only 1 (14%) case of benign lesions.

 

Table 9: ASSOCIATION OF LYMPHADENOPATHY IN NEOPLASTIC and INFECTIVE/ INFLAMMATORY LESIONS

LYMPHADENOPATHY

NEOPLASTIC LESIONS

INFECTIVE / INFLAMMATORY LESIONS (%)

TOTAL

(%)

BENIGN (%)

MALIGNANT (%)

 

PRESENT

1 (14%)

26 (87%)

6 (46%)

33 (66%)

ABSENT

6 (86%)

4 (13%)

7 (54%)

17 (34%)

TOTAL

7

30

13

50 (100%)

 


DISCUSSION

This prospective observational study was performed on 50 patients with suspected extracranial head and neck lesions. We studied the role of MR imaging in various extracranial head and neck lesions. Maximum numbers of patients were seen in age group of 41 to 60 years (38%) followed by 21-40 years (30%).A slight male preponderance was seen in our study.

All extracranial head and neck lesions were divided into neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. Both neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions were prevalent in 4th to 6th decades.Most common neoplastic lesions were tongue carcinoma followed by, buccal mucosal carcinoma, mandibular alveolar carcinoma and malignant lymphadenopathy. Most common non-neoplastic lesions were multinodular goiter, parotitis, thyroid ophthalmopathy and lymphadenopathy (2 cases each).Anatomically most common site involved was oral cavity. Most common morphology of the extracranial head and neck lesions was solid type of lesion. The commonest signal intensity pattern in all benign, infective / inflammatory and malignant lesions was hypointensity on T1W and hyperintensity on T2W and STIR images. Though signal intensity characteristics are similar in neoplastic and infective / inflammatory and benign lesions, it was observed that majority of neoplastic lesions were heterogeneous in signal intensity while the majority of infective / inflammatory lesions were homogeneous in signal intensity.Most common enhancement pattern observed in neoplastic and infective / inflammatory lesions was heterogeneous enhancement. This was followed by homogenous and rim enhancement. Most common associated findings were lymphadenopathy accounting for 66% of all the lesions in this study. Morphologically lymph nodes in malignant lesions had irregular borders, heterogeneous T2W signal, areas of necrosis and heterogeneous contrast enhancement. Lymphadenopathy in benign and infective lesions showed homogenous T2W signal without necrosis and homogenous enhancement6. In cases of laryngeal carcinoma MR imaging was superior to depict invasions of paraglottic space, cartilage, vocal cords and preglottic space. Spread of tumor across midline was demonstrated with STIR images without need of gadolinium. Loss of normal high fatty marrow signal on T1W images implies early mandibular invasion. Erosion and remodeling of bones could be assessed on MRI but CT was better for evaluation of bones.MR can differentiate thickened mucosa and retained secretions from malignancy on the basis of enhancement pattern.MR imaging in thyroid can detect even small nodules with calcification and hemorrhage. T2W hyperintensity was characteristic for nodules. Pseudocapsule can be assessed in case of thyroid malignancy but dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging is essential for diagnosis.Lesions with fat intensity on T1W and T2W images showing suppression on fat suppression sequences were pathognomonic of dermoid.Definitive diagnosis of type of hemangioma requires dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging.

 

CONCLUSION

  • Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly sensitive imaging modality in the evaluation of extracranial head and neck lesions, because of its excellent soft tissue contrast resolution and lack of ionizing radiation.
  • MRI helps in determining the site of origin of the lesion and its characterization. MRI is superior to CT in assessing internal architecture of the lesion and extension / spread into the adjacent structures.
  • MRI can detect perineural spread, which is helpful in patient management.
  • Morphological characterization of lymph nodes and enhancement pattern can help differentiating benign and malignant lymphadenopathy.
  • Replacement of normal fatty marrow with tumor tissue can be detected at a much earlier stage with MR imaging hence, changing surgical approach.
  • MR imaging can be safely done in pregnant women and patients with deranged renal function tests.
  • However, time of examination, patient co-operation and cost are limitations of MR imaging. Furthermore, MR imaging cannot be performed in patients with dental implants and surgical clips.
  • In our initial experience, it is concluded that MRI imaging is an extremely useful tool in evaluating patients with extracranial head and neck lesions due to its superior soft tissue contrast resolution.

 

REFERENCES

  • Adeyemi BF, Adekunle LV, Kolude BM, Akang EE, Lawoyin JO. Head and neck cancer--a clinicopathological study in a tertiary care center. J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Jun;100(6):690-7.
  • Mehrotra R, Singh M, Gupta RK, Singh M, Kapoor AK. Trends of prevalence and pathological spectrum of head and neck cancers in North India. Indian J Cancer. 2005 Apr-Jun;42(2):89-93.
  • Siddiqui MS, Chandra R, Aziz A, Suman S. Epidemiology and histopathological spectrum of head and neck cancers in Bihar, a state of Eastern India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):3949-53.
  • Otto RA, Bowes AK. Neck masses: benign or malignant? Sorting out the causes by age-group. Postgrad Med. 1990 Jul;88(1):199-204.
  • Wippold FJ. Head and neck imaging: the role of CT and MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2007 Mar;25(3):453-65.
  • de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Bakers F, Casselman JW, Peutz-Kootstra C, Kremer B, Hofman PA, Beets-Tan RG et al. Morphological MRI criteria improve the detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: multivariate logistic regression analysis of MRI features of cervical lymph nodes. Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):626-33.
  • Andisheh-Tadbir A, Mehrabani D, Heydari ST. Epidemiology of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity in Iran. J Craniofac Surg. 2008 Nov;19(6):1699-702